Coding evaluators
Review generated code for correctness and maintainability.
Senior engineers for AI training
Screens are run by a staff engineer, not a recruiter. You get a written screening record for every shortlisted candidate, and a replacement if someone does not produce.
Repository or work history · structured technical screen · optional paid work sample
Screening method, not a candidate profile.
The gap
A CV will not tell you whether someone can read unfamiliar code, apply your rubric the same way twice, and defend a call your reviewers can audit. That is the work. General recruiters are not set up to test it, and marketplaces hand the testing back to your team.
Roles
Review generated code for correctness and maintainability.
Author and evaluate technical examples.
Repository-level tasks that test real engineering workflows.
Calibrate reviewers and hold one standard.
What you receive
Written to be argued with, not to sell.
Terms
If an engineer we place does not produce, you do not pay for them and we replace them.
Evaluation data
Priced per unit rather than per hour.
See evaluation dataWho you are working with
Screens are run by a staff engineer with over a decade building and operating production software, who has personally interviewed several hundred senior engineers and engineering managers, and who does hands-on AI training work today.
Reach into senior engineers comes from four years mentoring in a US and Canada engineering programme, and ongoing membership of senior engineering communities in India.
Ready to start?
Share the work, the technical bar, and where the search is getting stuck.
Discuss a search